Owner left $13 million fortune to her cat

How would your cat spend millions of dollars? Fill the house with custom feline furnishings? Purchase costly gems and flush it down the can? 

A year ago, a 94-year old Italian beneficiary passed away and left her whole $13 million fortune to her feline, Tommaso. The beneficiary, Maria Assunta, was bereft and childless when she received Tommaso, a bug ridden stray feline meandering the lanes of Rome.

In appreciation, Tommaso turned into her adoring and committed friend. Consequently, when Ms. Assunta passed on, she clearly felt Tommaso merited her whole bequest. Italian law, be that as it may, precludes passing on one's riches straightforwardly to a creature, so Ms. Assunta named her attendant, companion and individual feline sweetheart, the confided in manager of Tommaso's consideration and bequest. 

Presently the medical caretaker and Tommaso live with another feline in the Roman wide open, in an undisclosed area, so as to maintain a strategic distance from fortune seekers and extortionists. 

Tommaso may be the most extravagant feline, yet before Tommaso turned into a tycoon, a German Shepherd named Gunther IV apparently acquired $124 million from a lady in Germany. Air pockets, a chimpanzee, acquired $2 million from Michael Jackson and a hen named Gigoo acquired about $15 million from distributing investor Miles Blackwell in 2002. 

I have blended emotions about this pattern to leave vulgar measures of cash to a couple of pets. On the off chance that somebody needs to leave a trust to guarantee their pet's welfare after their own passing, that isn't just altogether justifiable, it is likewise dependable. Yet, to leave millions? Strange. Particularly when such a significant number of creatures — and individuals — experience the ill effects of an absence of assets and appropriate consideration. 

What do you think? Do you intend to leave a trust for your pet? Do you figure it ought to be lawful to leave tremendous wholes of cash to one creature?